Skip to main content

Sye Ten Bruggencate - Proof of God - Part 1

I call it part 1.  If he corrects this problem, maybe there will be a part 2.

Sye Ten Bruggencate is a presuppositional apologist that claims that he has a proof that God exists on his website:  http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/

At least, that's what I heard on The Thinking Atheist podcast today.  Apparently, not so much a proof, rather a series of questions.  That is not a logical proof.  So, let's go through and try to extract a logical proof.

This is presented on his website as a series of questions:


Now, by far, my favorite one of these, is the one in the bottom right.  It takes you to Disney's website. Comedy gold.

But let's go through this from the agnostic perspective.

I chose, "I Don't Know if Absolute Truth Exists".  This takes you to a second page:


Based on the previous response, there is no acceptable answer here.  This forces you to pick "Absolutely True" based on your previous choice, but you already stated that absolute truth doesn't exist.  I believe that I don't know if absolute truth exists, but I don't absolutely know that.

This is a false dichotomy.  It is many more things as well, but it is at least that.  This is sufficient to render his proof unsound.

There's more, but there's no need to continue.  It is a cumulative argument, and one fallacy defeats it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

39

Three decades I have walked the Earth.  Almost four.  I have known what it is to be loved by good parents, to be alienated and abused by classmates, to be a failure at scholastic pursuits, to be a success at scholastic pursuits, to find a family apart from heredity, to know love with the joys and pains that brings, to be a father of three wonderful children, and to be a master craftsman at my profession.  I have seen the glory of man, and the failure of man. When I was a young child, I gave my life to Christ.  I still remember the event, or at least I think I do.  Evergreen Baptist Church.  Vacation Bible School.  Altar call.  I was moved to move, to walk the path, to commit my life to Christ.  I have never had a burning passion for Christ, but I have held him in my heart.  In college I drifted away, as is the tendency.  When I became serious with my now wife, we agreed to walk the road of life together as a Christian family....

Critique: The New Answers Book 3, Chapter 3, Ken Ham and Roger Patterson

In reference to:  The New Answers Book 3, Chapter 3 Several assertions are made that are false, and several questionable tactics are used. Abiogenesis and Evolution [Humanists] want a monopoly on the teaching of molecules-to-man evolution in the public school science classroom. ... evolutionism in the sense of the belief aspects of evolution [life arising by natural processes, etc.] ... Embedded in this assertion is that evolution includes the formation of life from non-life.  This is incorrect.   Evolution  is a biological theory that describes how species of life change into other species of life.   Abiogenesis  is the development from life from non-life.  It is fair to characterize abiogenesis in a pre-consensus state.  It is not fair to consider this a shortcoming of evolution as they are distinct. Advocating Evolution as Religious An effort is made to show that "belief" in evolution is religious, and as such, teaching evolut...

Andy McIntosh - What about the Fossils - Part 8 (Stasis)

This is part 8 of a series of commentaries on material presented by Andy McIntosh.  This material was presented at a church that I attend.  It has been presented other places as well. For reference, related arguments were presented by McIntosh in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPUU9Wb8yzQ Stasis One of McIntosh's main points is the concept of stasis .  This means that things don't change for a long time (things like feathers and turtles).  It seems the point here is: "so evolution is wrong". He seems to be saying that either everything evolves by changing constantly, or his version of young earth creationism is true.  There are many other options of course. It could be that evolutionary theory can explain this.  It could be that aliens made life on earth.  If this were indeed evidence against the current theory of evolution, that would not make it evidence for young earth creationism.  Maybe if every species coul...