Skip to main content

Andy McIntosh - Atheism vs. God - Part 2 (Bacterial Flagellum)

This is part 2 of a series of commentaries on material presented by Andy McIntosh.  This material is related to material that was presented at a church that I attend.  It has been presented other places as well.

For reference, related arguments were presented by McIntosh in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNIwh6-KEe0

Note that this exact slide was not presented at the local event.  Where it fits into McIntosh's argument against atheism can be seen in the video.  I presume it was omitted due to time.  If there is another reason and I am notified, I may withdraw this article.

Note

Andy McIntosh has notified me that the flagellum he presented is different than the flagellum discussed in the court case.  This is true, and it was not my intent to suggest otherwise.

Bacterial Flagellum

Around 41:00, the bacterial flagellum is discussed.  McIntosh goes on to discuss more complicated versions, eventually getting to the coup-de-chart:



McIntosh states, around 42:50, "... and you say that's not indicating design?"

Who says this?  Per evolutionary theory it is designed by variability and natural selection.  This is a bottom-up design process that selects for advantage.

On Trial

A court case was held, Kitzmiller v. Dover, where Michael Behe and Kenneth Miller discussed this at length.

From the (republican-appointed judge’s) opinion (the document published by the judge discussing his findings and the case), Honorable John E. Jones III writes:
Contrary to Professor Behe’s assertions with respect to these few biochemical systems among the myriad existing in nature, however, Dr. Miller presented evidence, based upon peer-reviewed studies, that they are not in fact irreducibly complex.
First, with regard to the bacterial flagellum, Dr. Miller pointed to peer-reviewed studies that identified a possible precursor to the bacterial flagellum, a subsystem that was fully functional, namely the Type-III Secretory System. (2:8-20 (Miller); P-854.23-854.32). Moreover, defense expert Professor Minnich admited that there is serious scientific research on the question of whether the bacterial flagellum evolved into the Type-III Secretary System, the Type-III Secretory System into the bacterial flagellum, or whether they both evolved from a common ancestor.
Trial Transcripts: http://ncse.com/creationism/legal/kitzmiller-trial-transcripts
Decision: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District

Logical Issues

Apart from the evidence that shows this not irreducibly complex - that shows it can be made by evolutionary processes - there is a more fundamental flaw.

This attempts to say that since we don't know how it happened, it didn't happen.  This is an appeal to ignorance which invalidates the argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

39

Three decades I have walked the Earth.  Almost four.  I have known what it is to be loved by good parents, to be alienated and abused by classmates, to be a failure at scholastic pursuits, to be a success at scholastic pursuits, to find a family apart from heredity, to know love with the joys and pains that brings, to be a father of three wonderful children, and to be a master craftsman at my profession.  I have seen the glory of man, and the failure of man. When I was a young child, I gave my life to Christ.  I still remember the event, or at least I think I do.  Evergreen Baptist Church.  Vacation Bible School.  Altar call.  I was moved to move, to walk the path, to commit my life to Christ.  I have never had a burning passion for Christ, but I have held him in my heart.  In college I drifted away, as is the tendency.  When I became serious with my now wife, we agreed to walk the road of life together as a Christian family....

Andy McIntosh - What about the Fossils - Part 8 (Stasis)

This is part 8 of a series of commentaries on material presented by Andy McIntosh.  This material was presented at a church that I attend.  It has been presented other places as well. For reference, related arguments were presented by McIntosh in the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPUU9Wb8yzQ Stasis One of McIntosh's main points is the concept of stasis .  This means that things don't change for a long time (things like feathers and turtles).  It seems the point here is: "so evolution is wrong". He seems to be saying that either everything evolves by changing constantly, or his version of young earth creationism is true.  There are many other options of course. It could be that evolutionary theory can explain this.  It could be that aliens made life on earth.  If this were indeed evidence against the current theory of evolution, that would not make it evidence for young earth creationism.  Maybe if every species coul...

Update: What is Knowledge

Back in 2008 I wrote a blog post where I discussed what I use as a working definition of knowledge.  I recently re-read it and realize that I now strongly disagree with that definition. Here is what I wrote: Knowledge, according to Dr. Bahnsen, requires three things. Belief. To know something, one must first believe it to be true. This should not really be surprising or debatable. Basis. To know something, one must have a reasonable justification for the belief. The belief you have must not be based on invalid data or invalid or arbitrary reasoning. Truth. To really know something, that thing that you know has to be true. The thing known must accurately represent the truth of the situation. I got this during an apologetic course I took at Grace Baptist Church.  There are major flaws with this definition.  When applied it can claim as knowledge multiple mutually exclusive claims.  The biggest problem is #3 - truth.  This definition requires for somet...